Open Records Request - 12/04/04

Request to Review Applications for Certificates of Occupancy

Note:  This request was research into possible illegal actions on the part of Code Enforcement personnel.  City employees are routinely withholding certificates of occupancy based on non-existent ordinances or illegal requirements from the city.



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Open Records Request - # 12-4
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 11:10:25 -0600
From: Ron West <rcw@ronwest.org>
To: Patricia Hutson <PHUTSON@nrhtx.com>


Dear Ms. Hutson:

This is a request under the Texas Open Records Act, chapter 552 of the Government Code (formerly V.T.C.S. article 6252) as well as Article I, Sec. 8 of the Texas Constitution, the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, the common law of the State of Texas and any statue providing for public access to government information.

I request that I be sent copies of the following documents or, if there are a large number, be permitted to inspect the following documents and receive copies of the ones I would like:

    All applications for a certificate of occupancy for any new or existing business to be located in North Richland Hills, Texas including all responses, notices and documents given to such applicants, relating to such applications, delivered, mailed or communicated in any written manner to businesses located in the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, by any Staff member of any department of North Richland Hills, Texas.
   This request is applicable only to such documents for the period of January 1, 2002 to the present time.  This is to specifically include all applications for occupancy of any kind during this same period.  I am particularly interested in communications regarding the destruction or removal of signs and/or any communications about city participation in the building of new monument type signs.  This specific interest should not preclude full disclosure of all the documents requested above.
      
If you have any questions about the nature or scope of this request, please call me at the phone number listed below. If you determine that all or some portion of the information requested is excepted from required disclosure, I request that you provide me with the portions of the requested information that are public and reasonably segrable from that which you believe is excepted. If any records are in active use or in storage, please certify this fact in writing and set a date and hour within a reasonable time when the records will be available, as required by section 552.221 of the Act. If you determine that all or some portion of the information requested is excepted from required public disclosure under a particular exception, I request that you advise me as to which exceptions you believe apply. If you rely on previous determination, please advise me of the applicable court decision or Attorney General's opinion. If there is no such determination, please advise me of the request for such an opinion, as required under section 552.301 of the Act, and a dated copy of your letter to the Attorney General. I call your attention to section 522.353 of the Act, which provides penalties for a failure to release public records. I am prepared to pay reasonable costs for copying, within the guidelines set by sections 552.261, 552.262, 552.263, 552.267, 552.268, 552.269.

I appreciate your attention to this and expect to hear from your office within ten days.

Sincerely,

Ron C. West

 

Compliance:   The City Secretary made arrangements for me to review any files that I was interested in at city offices.  An appointment was made and the initial records that needed to be looked at, were reviewed.  If there is a need to review other specific cases, an additional Open Records Request will be required for compliance.  They do not allow this research into open records to occur without such a written request.  (i.e.,  you can't call and just ask them for what you need.)  Files appear to be incomplete and the investigation is continuing.