NRH LOSES BARBARA DAVIS CONVICTION DUE
TO FALSIFICATIONS BY NRH POLICE OFFICER!
The following is a quote from the decision of the
Appellate Court in
In light of the lack of evidence to support the confidential informant's
information or the informant's reliability, coupled with the attesting
officer's failure to corroborate the allegedly illegal. activity in particular, we must conclude that the officer, at a minimum,
made several statements in his affidavit with reckless disregard for their
truth and knowingly made false assumptions and statements regarding appellant's
identity, location, and vehicle. Thus, it is clear that Officer Wallace's
affidavit contained several falsehoods, some that related to the background of
the untested confidential informant, others that related to verification of the
actual identities of both targets and the location of one of them, and still
others that were made with reckless disregard of the truth or accuracy
regarding the illegal activity claimed. We cannot agree with the State that
these falsities were mere "mistakes" the officer made when the
evidence shows that the officer made
these sworn statements with reckless disregard for their truth. When the false statements are removed, there
remains no probable cause to support the arrest of the two individuals who were
named, "
See Franks, 483
Because we have determined that the trial court should have granted
appellant's motion to suppress due to the search and arrest warrant's lack of
probable cause under the totality of the circumstances and inclusion of statements made
with reckless disregard for the truth, as shown at the Franks hearing,
we sustain appellant's sole point. The
judgment of the trial court is reversed and the case is remanded to the trial
court for disposition in officer's failure to corroborate the allegedly illegal
accordance with this opinion.
FN6. As we know, "Barbara Lynn
Davis" was not even the person who was actually arrested. This is
particularly troubling since this warrant was not solely a search warrant.
Copr. @ West 2004 No Claim to Orig.
This decision by the court
will bring all convictions from North Richland Hills into question since it is
obvious that the knowledge of these falsifications was wide spread within the leadership
of the police department and possibly other city officials. In a separate case, the wrongful death
lawsuit against the city, the same no knock warrant was the basis for the raid. In that case the city has refused to even
discuss settlement with the plaintiff.
More will be added on this
item soon.
The
entire decision by the Appellate Court is available in a PDF file.