Is NRH
Mayor Trying to Intimidate Citizen Presentations?
By Ron West
I don’t know about everyone, but for
me, getting up to speak before any public audience is quite nerve racking. My voice cracks, my heart thumps and my
breathing rate increases almost uncontrollably.
Only the importance of communicating can drive me to stand up and
speak. This condition has a name –
“stage fright”. Speaking in public is
one of the highest ranking fears of almost all people.
Our Mayor should be aware that it
takes a lot of effort and concern for any citizen to step up to the podium
during a Council Meeting and then try to communicate what he or she considers
important to the Council and Public in the very tightly controlled two minutes
provided. The Mayor makes a point of
cutting off the comments at exactly two minutes.
Now it appears that a new weapon
designed to cut off comments has emerged under Mayor Trevino. If you don’t like what any citizen is saying
– simply call them liars publicly and use the City’s Website and Citicable to
attempt to discredit anything anyone says that you don’t like. Since anything that anyone says against our
sitting Mayor faces claims of untruths – the following is a direct quote from
the minutes of the Council Meeting
“Mayor Trevino asked
the City Manager to send a letter to Mr. Siskel addressing each of his comments. Mayor Trevino asked
the City Manager to specifically explain how the assumptions regarding the
purchase of the Food Lion property were wrong, and to clarify the number of
public meetings held and the numerous press releases and news articles on the
subject matters mentioned by Mr. Siskel.
Mayor Trevino advised the assumption of City Hall moving did not come
from the City and also asked that a letter be posted on the web site and also
post letter on Citicable prior to the presentation of meeting to address the falsehoods and questions being asked.”
Both Mr. Siskel’s speech before
the City Council and the rebuttal sent by City Manager Cunningham are posted on
this website for your review. Mr.
Cunningham’s responses shows no “falsehoods” and looks
a lot like an attempt to “spin” information to meet the desires of city
leadership. You can read Mr. Siskel’s requests for information before the Council for
yourself and then read the response from Mr. Cunningham – including clarifying
comments that have been inserted – in an attempt to deal with the misleading
information in Mr. Cunningham’s response.
Citizens should take heart in the fact that Mayor Trevino
is finally responding and that sensitive questions are being asked by
citizens. If we as citizens had been
active and awake, we might not have had the
No, the problems in our city are not the fault of the
Mayor and City Council; they are our own fault by not speaking up before
them. It is very important that each and
every citizen who desires to speak before the Council knows that they have the
right to do so and to be treated with
respect. It is time for the
Mayor and Council to understand that they are Public Servants and not Public
Masters! It is also time
that our Mayor learns that he owes the citizens both courtesy and respect. A person in his position should be a
statesman – not an attack dog. Citizens
and voters have no obligation to rubber stamp the actions of the Mayor and
Council and they certainly have a right to speak without being called liars.
The City Government of NRH has been closed to the public
for too long. Please don’t let the
tactics of the Mayor scare you off. You
have a right to question all of his public actions.
Letter/ E-mail Responses Received:
Mr. West,
It is not my intention
that the City Council treat any citizen with the level
of disrespect that I witnessed being directed to you and Mr. Siskel. The
Mayor, Mayor Pro-Tem and City Attorney need to remember that they, too, were
once mere citizens.
Although I do not
remember the exact quote of Mayor Trevino when he berated Mr. Siskel, the
response sent by the City Manager did not justify the Mayor's statements.
This is mostly in regards to the number of Public Hearings held prior to the
initiation of
My review of the
response shows a total lack of disregard for the citizens of our city in the
handling of the
1. Since the
inception of
2.
The City Council, on
Let me assure you that
the public is not alone in being unsuccessful in attempting to obtain
documentation relating to this project. I, personally, inquired about
various ordinances voted on by the council (Ordinances #2350, 2360, 2420 &
2495). Like other citizens, I was directed to the Public Library, which I
was told was the repository for all City Ordinances. These Ordinances are
not at the Library, and I was directed back to City Hall. As of this
writing, I have not reapproached City Hall, but was
able to get a copy of Ordinance #2420 from you.
In the past, when talk
arose about the widening of
I understand that the
"proposed" expansion of
The funds generated by
Please be assured that
I will continue to investigate this
Nancy Bielik
City Council, Place 6